Launching Field Trials With Confidence: A Starter Toolkit for Educators and Researchers

Field trials test the impact of an education program (e.g., program, policy, curriculum). These trials answer important questions for schools: what works, for whom, and under what conditions. Field trials need careful planning, clear guidance for consistent implementation, and ample resources.

Program providers are organizations that develop education programs for school settings. Providers are busy and often have limited knowledge of how to plan for a field trial. This toolkit helps bridge that gap. It offers practical tools and templates designed for real-world use. The toolkit will help program providers work with research teams such as research organizations or universities.

The Field Study Starter Toolkit is a free resource. It guides providers through the process of deciding whether to conduct a field study and how to get started. Providers can use the toolkit to assess readiness for a field trial and examine whether implementation of the intervention is feasible in educational settings. Additionally, the research partners can use the toolkit to clarify roles and expectations for the provider and research organization during the field trial.

Download the interactive toolkit | Download the 508-compliant PDF

The Challenge: Preparing for a Field Trial Is Complex

Pilot studies and internal evaluations often focus on feasibility, and providers use them to inform program improvement. Field trials, on the other hand, test whether an intervention produces intended outcomes in specific settings, such as during the school day, after school, or in virtual environments. Well-executed field trials measure the impact of the product on student and educator outcomes.

Schools, districts, and other education leaders prioritize the use of evidence-based interventions. Many providers seek to prove the effectiveness of their interventions. Field trials can generate this evidence. However, they require investments of time, funding, and coordination. Because the quality and usefulness of findings depend on careful preparation, providers may need clear guidance in several areas:

What field trials require;
How to assess whether their intervention is ready for a field trial;
How to define and document the implementation model; and
How to clarify roles and responsibilities across partners.

The Field Study Starter Toolkit addresses this need with practical tools that help organizations assess readiness and take next steps. The toolkit includes three core tools:

A Readiness for Rigorous Field Trials Tool to determine whether an intervention is ready for a rigorous study.
An Implementation Feasibility and Fit Analysis Tool to examine how the intervention will work in real settings.
A Roles and Responsibilities Planning Guide Tool to define expectations and support coordination across partners.

Tool 1: Readiness for Rigorous Field Trials

This tool helps the research partners decide whether to move forward with a field trial.

The tool includes these components:

Clearly defined readiness criteria across key domains;
Guided reflection questions to support discussion and shared understanding of readiness;
Structured prompts to identify strengths and areas for growth across readiness domains; and
Opportunities to document key insights and next steps.

Using this tool, providers assess both their intervention and organizational readiness to participate in a field trial. Providers can use these insights to guide discussions and build a shared understanding among stakeholders. Providers can also identify next steps for preparing an intervention for a field trial. Providers can complete the tool alone or with research partners and revisit it over time.

Result: Providers better understand their readiness for a field trial. This helps them make clear, evidence-based decisions about what to do next.

Tool 2: Implementation Feasibility and Fit Analysis

This tool helps providers examine how their intervention will work in real-world settings. It focuses on whether necessary conditions are in place for successful implementation.

The tool includes these components:

Key dimensions of feasibility and fit (e.g., setting characteristics, staffing, resource needs);
Prompts to assess alignment between the intervention and implementation context;
Guidance to identify potential barriers and enabling conditions; and
Space to document risks, considerations, and possible adaptations.

Using this tool, providers examine how their intervention aligns with study sites and implementation environments. They can identify mismatches, anticipate challenges, and plan supports to improve implementation. Teams can use the tool iteratively during planning, focusing on specific sites or revisiting it as conditions change.

Result: Providers gain a clearer view of how their intervention works in real life. They are also more ready to help make it successful.

Tool 3: Roles and Responsibilities Planning Guide

This tool helps providers and research partners define roles, align expectations, and coordinate work during a field trial.

The tool includes these components:

Key role categories across partners (e.g., implementation, data collection, analysis, communication, oversight, dissemination);
Prompts to define responsibilities and decision-making authority;
Guidance for identifying areas of shared responsibility or potential overlap; and
Templates to document roles and agreements.

With this tool, providers and partners set responsibilities, align expectations, and create communication norms. They can also identify and address potential gaps in shared understanding of roles and responsibilities early. Teams can use the tool during the planning phase and can revisit it as needed.

Result: Teams are better aligned, with clear roles and coordinated processes that support smooth implementation.

Moving Forward With Confidence

Together, these three tools provide structured yet flexible support for field trial preparation. The tools help research partners get on the same page, address important questions, and move forward with a plan. This approach balances strong research with real-world practicality.

The research reported here is supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R324A230040 to the American Institutes for Research. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the Institute or the U.S. Department of Education.

Contact

Services

Research & Evaluation