Skip to main content
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Contact

Search form

American Institutes for Research

  • Our Work
    • AIR Assessment
    • Education
    • Health
    • International
    • Workforce
    • ALL TOPICS >
  • Our Services
    • Student Assessment
    • Research and Evaluation
    • Policy, Practice, and Systems Change
  • Our Experts
  • News & Events

You are here

  • Home

Social, Economic, and Environmental Impact Assessment of Cotton Farming in Madhya Pradesh, India

Image of woman in colorful sari picking cotton

Images courtesy of Dinesh Khanna for C&A Foundation

Worldwide demand for cotton products that meet certification standards—organic, fair trade, etc.—has grown over the past 10 years. India is the largest producer of cotton in the world.

As of 2016-17, India produced 5.88 million metric tons of cotton and exported 1.26 million metric tons. India is also the largest producer of organic cotton, accounting for 56% of the world’s production. This includes organic cotton produced as part of the Better Cotton Initiative (BCI), a subset of organic cotton farmers who adhere to less restrictive standards on crop inputs but more restrictive social and labor standards than those of organic cotton, including promoting decent work practices.

The Study

Image of men on a cotton truck in IndiaAIR—funded by the C&A Foundation and in partnership with Outline India and Thinkstep India—conducted a social and economic impact assessment, and contributed to an environmental impact assessment of cotton farming in Madhya Pradesh, a central Indian state and the largest organic cotton producer in the country. This mixed methods study aims to better understand the socioeconomic and environmental outcomes of organic and BCI cotton farming, compared with conventional cotton farming. The research team examined outcomes of five subgroups of cotton farmers:

  • Conventional (non-organic)
  • Exclusive organic (farmers only producing organic cotton)
  • Exclusive BCI (farmers only producing BCI cotton)
  • Non-exclusive organic (farmers producing both organic and conventional cotton)
  • Non-exclusive BCI (farmers producing both BCI and conventional cotton)
Results

Results from the impact assessment reports include:

  • Both organic and BCI farmers are socioeconomically better off than conventional farmers—they’re more likely to own a color television, refrigerator, computer, concrete or tiled roof, livestock, and more.
  • On average, exclusive organic cotton farmers use 66 days of family labor and 430 days of wage labor, while non-exclusive organic cotton farmers use 114 days of family labor and 524 days of wage labor.
  • On average, exclusive BCI farmers use 97 days of family labor and 584 days of wage labor, while non-exclusive BCI farmers use 93 days of family labor and 506 days of wage labor.
  • Organic farmers are more likely to be in debt and have higher debts than conventional farmers; of the organic farmers, 93 percent reported at least one household member having a loan. This is compared with 84 percent of conventional cotton farmers.
  • BCI farmers are more likely to be to be in debt and have higher debts than conventional farmers; of the BCI farmers, 89 percent reported at least one household member with a loan. This is compared with 84 percent of conventional cotton farmers.
  • Some evidence suggests that BCI farmers are less likely to use child labor than conventional farmers. Of farmers licensed by BCI with children ages 6 to 14 years old, 98 percent reported that the children are enrolled in school, compared with 95 percent in conventional cotton farming households.
  • On average, exclusive organic farmers, non-exclusive organic farmers, and conventional farmers all saw a loss on their cotton production between 2017 and 2018, but a substantial percentage of the farmers made a profit.

 

Project
Social and Economic Impact Assessment of Cotton Farming in Madhya Pradesh (PDF)
Social, Economic and Environmental Impact Assessment of Cotton Farming in Madhya Pradesh (PDF)

Related Work

Illustration: Meet the Expert: Thomas de Hoop
21 Aug 2019
Q & A

Meet the Expert: Dr. Thomas de Hoop

Thomas de Hoop is a development economist, with twelve years of experience designing, implementing, and leading mixed-methods impact evaluations and systematic reviews. His work has primarily revolved around South Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, and Latin America.
View all
Share

Contact

Image of Thomas de Hoop

Thomas De Hoop

Principal Economist

Topics

International
Agriculture

Related Resources

Quasi-experimental Impact Evaluation of IFAD’s AD2M Project in Madagascar

Related Projects

Impact Evaluation of Plantwise, Kenya - CABI
2SCALE/Contract Farming in Africa
Smallholder Dairy Commercialisation Programme

RESEARCH. EVALUATION. APPLICATION. IMPACT.

About Us

About AIR
Board of Directors
Leadership
Experts
Clients
Contracting with AIR
Contact Us

Our Work

AIR Assessment
Education
Health
International
Workforce

Client Services

Student Assessment
Research and Evaluation
Policy, Practice, and
Systems Change

News & Events

Careers at AIR


Search form


 

Connecting

FacebookTwitterLinkedinYouTubeInstagram

American Institutes for Research

1000 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW
Washington, DC 20007
Call: (202) 403-5000
Fax: (855) 459-6213

Copyright © 2019 American Institutes for Research®.  All rights reserved.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap