School districts across the country are increasingly using online courses to expand credit recovery options for high school students who need to recover credit after failing a course. However, the growing use of online credit recovery for high school students has considerably outpaced the research. As concerns mount over how much students learn in online courses, and as questions arise about how to best implement online credit recovery, there is a critical need for rigorous evidence about the use of online credit recovery for high school students.
AIR, in partnership with the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD), received a federal grant from the U.S. Department of Education’s Institute of Education Sciences to study online credit recovery. The study focuses on first-year high school students who failed Algebra 1 or ninth-grade English (English 9) and retook the course during the summer before their second year of high school.
Within each participating school, the study used a lottery to determine whether each student took the school’s typical teacher-directed class or a class that used an online learning model. The online classes used a curriculum supplied by an online provider and included an in-class teacher whose role was to monitor students as they worked through the course and to provide supplemental instruction targeted to students’ needs. The credit recovery classes for the study took place during summer 2018 and summer 2019 in 24 LAUSD high schools.
Listen to Jordan Rickles discuss the project on the Michigan Virtual Learning Research Institute's podcast >>
The study has two main goals:
- Provide rigorous evidence about the blended-learning course’s effects on student outcomes compared with a standard teacher-directed course.
- Describe how the blended-learning course provides students with different instructional experiences compared with a standard teacher-directed course.
The project will produce a series of research briefs that discuss the findings regarding the relative effect of the online credit recovery classes compared with the teacher-directed classes on students’ near- and longer-term outcomes, how the online and teacher-directed classes were implemented, and a cost analysis.
The first brief provides an overview of the study, including descriptions of the study’s online learning model, participants, and implementation and study outcome measures.
The second brief highlights key findings about implementation and student academic outcomes at the end of the summer term for Algebra 1 credit recovery classes.
The third brief highlights key findings about implementation and student academic outcomes at the end of the summer term for English 9 credit recovery classes.
The fourth brief highlights key findings about the differences in the resources and costs between the online and teacher-directed credit recovery courses.
A forthcoming technical supplement will provide more details about the study sample, data, measures, and analyses.