More Than 100 AIR Experts Participate at the American Educational Research Association Conference

11 Apr 2005
News Release

Washington, D.C. – At-risk students show improved test scores when challenged by rigorous, engaging instruction, according to findings to be released by the American Institutes for Research (AIR) at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) in Montreal April 11 - 15. More than 100 AIR experts will be participating in the conference, covering topics from full-day Kindergarten to adult literacy.

AIR will also celebrate the creation of the new AERA-AIR (A²) Fellows program designed to build the talent pool of highly skilled education researchers and technical assistance providers during a reception on April 12, 7:30 – 9:30 p.m. at the Le Centre Sheraton Montreal Hotel.

At-risk students show improved test scores when challenged by rigorous instructional approaches that emphasize higher-order thinking skills, according to a recent AIR study regarding English and math programs designed for secondary schools that will be presented at the conference. The findings offer educators hope that they can increase achievement by teaching with a rigorous, challenging approach. “Our findings show us that an emphasis on higher-order thinking skills is critical to student engagement for all students, and the rewards of using rigorous instruction with disadvantaged students is particularly significant,” said Senior AIR Research Analyst Kerstin Carlson Le Floch, regarding the evaluation of the program developed by the College Board.

Highlights from a selection of other AIR papers and chaired sessions at the conference include:

  • A session on expanding the horizon for evidence-based research that takes a close look at innovative                    education research design. The session is chaired by AIR Senior Vice President for Research George Bohrnstedt.
  • Several AIR presentations will focus on the challenges and opportunities of transforming large high schools to small learning communities. Papers on this topic will focus on the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s high school reform initiative, including an examination of early outcomes for students. Another paper explores implementation of the high school transformation initiative, particularly within large, traditional high schools. A third paper delves into classrooms and describes teaching and learning strategies in some of the most innovative schools in the country, and the final paper on this topic begins to bring students’ voices into the conversation. Together, these papers tell a comprehensive story of the most ambitious efforts to transform the secondary education system in the United States.
  • AIR will present outcomes regarding the evaluation of school-community partnerships. Collaborative federal funding has enabled schools, families, and community agencies across the country to join forces, implementing prevention and early intervention initiatives that systemically address emotional, behavioral, safety, and community violence issues impacting learning outcomes for school-age youth. These “Safe Schools/Healthy Students” programs take place in more than 180 urban, suburban, and rural settings, addressing such problems as poverty, school violence, drug use, gang participation, teen suicide, and fragmented support systems. This session will detail the outcomes and lessons learned from evaluations of one rural and two urban sites.
  • AIR will present a comparative evaluation of alternative education settings. The study was designed to learn more about what characterizes effective alternative programs and how alternative settings are meeting the needs of youth with disabilities.

Reports released at AERA are available on www.air.org. AIR experts are available to discuss a wide range of education topics, including student achievement, college financial aid, education technology, and media literacy. To arrange interviews with authors and other experts, please contact Larry McQuillan at 202.403.5119.

 

About AIR

The American Institutes for Research, founded in 1946, is a leader in the behavioral and social sciences. AIR is a non-partisan, not-for-profit organization engaged in domestic and international research, development, evaluation, analysis, product development, training and technical assistance and assessment.

Related Content

15 Apr 2005
Report

The Mexican Translation of TIMSS-1995: Lessons on Test Translation from a Post-Mortem Study

This paper is a contribution to test translation review. It provides a conceptual framework for the coding of translation errors, and provides some empirical evidence on the effect of translation errors on student performance.

15 Apr 2005
Report

Relationships Between Family Risks and Children’s Reading and Mathematics Growth from Kindergarten Through Third Grade

This paper explores whether kindergartners’ reading and mathematics gains over the first 4 years of school are more strongly associated with particular risk factors alone or in combination, as opposed to the cumulative number of family risk factors a child experiences. Second, the analysis makes use of the reading and mathematics data collected at 4 time points to describe achievement growth over time, rather than using scores from two time points as a measure of academic gain.

11 Apr 2005
Report

The Lifecycle of Comprehensive School Reform

In September 2000, the U.S. Department of Education awarded a grant to AIR to conduct the National Longitudinal Evaluation of Comprehensive School Reform (NLECSR). The NLECSR is a quantitative and qualitative study of behavior, decisions, processes, and outcomes.

11 Apr 2005
Report

Conducting Large-Scale Research in Adult ESL: Challenges and Approaches for the Explicit Literacy Impact Study

The purpose of this AIR-led study is to test the impact of a curriculum-based explicit literacy intervention for low-literacy adult ESL learners.

11 Apr 2005
Report

Using Item Difficulty and Item Position to Measure Test Fatigue

This study compared item difficulties (p-values and b-parameters) from administering the same items in field testing and live testing. Negative changes in item performance based on test position may indicate student fatigue. Contrary to some previous evidence, results showed declines in student performance as items dropped to lower positions on tests.

11 Apr 2005
Report

Measuring and Explaining the Fidelity of CSR Implementation

Comprehensive school reform (CSR) is only as effective as its implementation. By using data collected for the National Longitudinal Evaluation of Comprehensive School Reform, this study explores how CSR model implementation varies as well as what factors predict CSR model implementation.

11 Apr 2005
Report

Beyond Free Lunch—Alternative Poverty Measures in Educational Research and Program Evaluation

Most education studies use a simple and convenient measure of poverty: the percentage of children eligible for free/reduced-price lunch. Although this measure provides the proportion of children coming from disadvantaged backgrounds, it does not capture all dimensions of poverty, such as neighborhood effects.

11 Apr 2005
Report

Deeper Look at Implementation: School-Level Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Comprehensive School Reform

This qualitative, comparative case study examines how school stakeholders understood comprehensive school reform (CSR) implementation, and how contextual factors influenced the process of CSR model implementation.

11 Apr 2005
Report

Fundamental Problems in the Measurement of Instructional Processes: Estimating Reasonable Effect Sizes and Conceptualizing What is Important to Measure

Developing reliable and valid national-level survey measures of instructional processes and other classroom conditions related to learning has proven exceptionally difficult. This report focuses on the size of the impact that can be expected from instruction and teachers on student achievement and on the conceptualization of measures of instruction and other classroom conditions related to learning.

11 Apr 2005
Report

The Implications of NCLB Accountability for Comprehensive School Reform

Each year, when states release assessment results, new schools join the ranks of those identified for improvement under No Child Left Behind (NCLB). Associated with this identification are mandated actions which have the potential to derail or redirect existing school reform efforts. The question remains of how to reconcile the implementation of NCLB accountability mandates with ongoing CSR efforts.

11 Apr 2005
Report

Adoption: Exploring the Initiation of Comprehensive School Reform Models

The process through which a school adopts a comprehensive school reform (CSR) model has been suggested to be a key element in the lifecycle of school reform, contributing to stakeholder buy-in and subsequent implementation. In this paper, we study the model adoption process, both on a national scale with survey data and in closer depth with qualitative case study data.

11 Apr 2005
Report

Summary: Evaluation of Mathematics with Meaning and Textual Power through Student Achievement Analysis

Student achievement depends on an array of factors within and beyond the classroom environment. Even within classrooms, a complex interplay of factors affects achievement. These factors include not only the curriculum but also teaching practices. In this paper, we are interested in two associated pilot programs, consisting of professional development, instructional strategies, and curricular materials and how these programs impact student achievement.

12 Apr 2005
Report

Student Content Engagement as a Construct for the Measurement of Effective Classroom Instruction and Teacher Knowledge

The effort to link statistically student achievement to measures of teaching or teachers has proven very difficult. Analysts generally agree that the impacts of effective teachers on student achievement are important. The problem for analysts has been in identifying the characteristics of high quality teaching or teachers.

11 Apr 2005
Report

Sustainability: Examining the Survival of Schools’ Comprehensive School Reform Efforts

By examining how comprehensive school reformers complete their life course, this paper highlights the importance of studying sustainability as well as the importance of being clear about what is being sustained.

11 Apr 2005
Report

The Role of Social Capital in Comprehensive School Reform

Using data from a large-scale program evaluation of comprehensive school reform (CSR), the authors of this report examine the role of social capital in the context of CSR.

11 Apr 2005
Report

A Multi-Method Approach to Evaluating Elementary School Comprehensive School Reform Models

The purpose of this paper is to 1) present a multi-methods approach of evaluating comprehensive school reform models, 2) describe the Comprehensive School Reform Quality Center’s standards for evaluating CSR effectiveness; and 3) provide pilot data and results from one comprehensive school reform model provider.

11 Apr 2005
Report

Evaluating the Implementation of Comprehensive School Reform and Its Impact on Growth in Student Achievement

This study examines the relationship between the implementation of comprehensive school reform (CSR) and growth in student achievement.

15 Apr 2005
Report

Relationships Between Family Risks and Children’s Reading and Mathematics Growth from Kindergarten Through Third Grade

This paper explores whether kindergartners’ reading and mathematics gains over the first 4 years of school are more strongly associated with particular risk factors alone or in combination, as opposed to the cumulative number of family risk factors a child experiences. Second, the analysis makes use of the reading and mathematics data collected at 4 time points to describe achievement growth over time, rather than using scores from two time points as a measure of academic gain.