Skip to main content
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Contact

Search form

American Institutes for Research

  • Our Work
    • Education
    • Health
    • International
    • Workforce
    • ALL TOPICS >
  • Our Services
    • Research and Evaluation
    • Technical Assistance
  • Our Experts
  • News & Events

You are here

  • Home
26 Oct 2016
Report

Race to the Top: Implementation and Relationship to Student Outcomes

Lisa Dragoset, Jaime Thomas, Mariesa Herrmann, John Deke, and Susanne James-Burdumy, Mathematica Policy Research
Cheryl Graczewski, Andrea Boyle, Rachel Upton, Courtney Tanenbaum, and Jessica Giffin, AIR

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 included $4.35 billion for Race to the Top (RTT), one of the Obama administration’s signature programs and one of the largest federal government investments in an education grant program. RTT awarded three rounds of grants to states that agreed to implement a range of education policies and practices designed to improve student outcomes. In particular, the program sought to improve student outcomes for high-need students, including English language learners (ELLs).

Given the importance and size of the RTT grant program, the U.S. Department of Education commissioned this evaluation to address the following broad issues:

  • Whether states that received an RTT grant used the policies and practices promoted by RTT and how that compares to other states
  • Whether use of these policies and practices included a focus on ELLs and whether that focus on ELLs differed between RTT and other states
  • Whether receipt of an RTT grant was related to improvement in student outcomes

This final report examines how receipt of RTT grants was related to student achievement over time in six main areas: (1) improving state capacity to support school improvement efforts; (2) adopting standards and assessments that prepare students to succeed in college and the workplace; (3) building state data systems that measure student growth and inform instruction; (4) recruiting, developing, rewarding, and retaining effective teachers and principals; (5) turning around low-performing schools; and (6) encouraging conditions in which charter schools can succeed.

Key Findings

In sum, it is not clear whether the RTT grants influenced the policies and practices used by states or whether they improved student outcomes.

  • In four of the six areas examined, early RTT states reported using more policies and practices promoted by RTT than non-RTT states in spring 2013.
  • Later RTT grantees reported using more RTT-promoted policies and practices related to teacher and principal certification and evaluation than non-RTT states in spring 2013.
  • Across all states, use of RTT-promoted policies and practices was most common for data systems and least common for teacher and principal certification and evaluation.
  • Across the six areas, early RTT states reported using more English language learner (ELL)-focused policies and practices promoted by RTT than non-RTT states.
  • Findings from spring 2012 and spring 2013 on states' use of RTT-promoted policies and practices were similar.
  • There were no significant differences between RTT and other states in use of RTT-promoted practices over time.
  • The relationship between RTT and student outcomes was not clear.
Race to the Top: Implementation and Relationship to Student Outcomes

Related Work

26 Oct 2016
News Release

Race to the Top Grant Program Associated with States’ Implementation of Particular Policies and Practices, Though Its Effect on Student Achievement Was Unclear

States with Race to the Top (RTT) grants from a $4.35 billion Obama Administration initiative enacted as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 used more of the RTT-promoted policies and practices designed to improve K-12 student achievement, according to a new report by Mathematica Policy Research, AIR, and Social Policy Research Associates for the U.S. Department of Education. However, it is not clear if RTT grants directly influenced student achievement.

Further Reading

  • Race to the Top Grant Program Associated with States’ Implementation of Particular Policies and Practices, Though Its Effect on Student Achievement Was Unclear
  • New Report from AIR, Mathematica Experts Describes Implementation of Policies And Practices Promoted by Race to the Top, School Improvement Grant Programs
  • Usage of Policies and Practices Promoted by Race to the Top and School Improvement Grants
  • School Improvement Grants: Implementation and Effectiveness
  • Federal School Improvement Grant Program Had No Significant Impact on Student Achievement
Share

Contact

Cheryl Graczewski

Cheryl Graczewski

Senior Researcher

Topic

Education
District and School Improvement
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

RESEARCH. EVALUATION. APPLICATION. IMPACT.

About Us

About AIR
Board of Directors
Leadership
Experts
Clients
Contracting with AIR
Contact Us

Our Work

Education
Health
International
Workforce

Client Services

Research and Evaluation
Technical Assistance

News & Events

Careers at AIR


Search form


 

Connecting

FacebookTwitterLinkedinYouTubeInstagram

American Institutes for Research

1400 Crystal Drive, 10th Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-3289
Call: (202) 403-5000
Fax: (202) 403-5000

Copyright © 2021 American Institutes for Research®.  All rights reserved.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap