Skip to main content
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Contact

Search form

American Institutes for Research

  • Our Work
    • Education
    • Health
    • International
    • Workforce
    • ALL TOPICS >
  • Our Services
    • Research and Evaluation
    • Technical Assistance
  • Our Experts
  • News & Events

You are here

  • Home
1 May 2010
Report

Out of the Debate and Into the Schools: Comparing Practices and Strategies in Traditional, Pilot and Charter Schools in the City of Boston

Supporting Evidence

Executive Summary

In January of 2009, the Boston Foundation, in partnership with the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, published Informing the Debate, which examined variations in student performance levels across the three types of public schools in Boston: traditional, pilot and charter schools. The choices for Boston’s students reflect similar choice trends across the nation, and fuel questions about the best option for serving all students well.

The findings of the study, conducted by a team from MIT and Harvard, suggest that middle and high school students who attend charter schools significantly outperform their counterparts attending traditional schools, while the differences in student performance between charter and pilot schools were mixed. Specifically, students who attended charter middle schools outperformed students who attended traditional schools by approximately 0.13 standard deviations in English language arts and by 0.5 standard deviations in mathematics, a difference that the reports cites as “roughly equivalent to the black-white achievement gap.”

In other words, the improvement in student performance from just one year of attendance at a charter middle school is enough to cut the black-white achievement gap in mathematics in half.

For high school students attending charter schools, the estimated gains in English language arts were between 0.16 and 0.19 standard deviations, with charter high school students also showing gains over their traditional school peers in writing (in both topic development and writing composition). While pilot elementary school students showed gains over their peers in traditional schools of approximately 0.09 standard deviations in English language arts, the estimated gains or losses for middle and high school students varied, and thus were determined to “deserve further study.”

These findings gained significant public attention, and created the impetus for more research focused on why charter school students outperform their peers.

This study uses the findings from Informing the Debate as a launching point to delve deeper into the issues that may explain differences in student outcomes – thus moving us out of the debate and into the schools. The study sheds light on the practices and strategies employed by traditional, pilot, and charter schools in the city of Boston. The main research questions driving this study were:

  • How do traditional, pilot and charter schools operate within each element of the autonomy framework?
  • What practices within the elements of the autonomy framework may account for differences in student performance levels at traditional, pilot and charter schools?
  • How do high performing traditional, pilot and charter schools operate within these autonomies and how are they similar or different from one another?
PDF icon Out of the Debate and Into the Schools: Comparing Practices and Strategies in Traditional, Pilot and Charter Schools in the City of Boston--Supporting Evidence

Related Work

1 Jan 2009
Report

Informing the Debate: Comparing Boston's Charter, Pilot and Traditional Schools

The first Charter School opened in Boston shortly after the landmark Massachusetts Education Reform Act in 1993. In 1995, the Boston Public Schools and the Boston Teacher’s Union responded by creating their own version of the autonomous school model, known as the “Pilot School.” Fifteen years later, the goal of this report is to assess the impact of these new school models on student achievement.

Topic: 
Education, Charter Schools and School Choice, District and School Improvement
12 May 2010
News Release

Study Finds Two Critical Elements in High-Achieving Traditional and Charter Schools: Autonomy in Both Staffing and Designing the School Day

A study by AIR sheds light on the specific strategies and practices that may account for differences in student achievement among Boston’s traditional, pilot, and charter schools. According to the study, high-achieving schools of all types—traditional, charter, and pilot—share a critical common characteristic: school leaders with enough autonomy to deliver support and the ability to adapt to the changing needs of students and staff quickly.

Further Reading

  • Study Finds Two Critical Elements in High-Achieving Traditional and Charter Schools: Autonomy in Both Staffing and Designing the School Day
  • Informing the Debate: Comparing Boston's Charter, Pilot and Traditional Schools
  • Tracking Teacher Effectiveness Gaps Between Charter Schools and Traditional Public Schools
  • More than 70 American Institutes for Research Experts to Participate in the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association
  • Teacher Value-Added in Charter Schools and Traditional Public Schools
Share

Topic

Education
Charter Schools and School Choice
District and School Improvement

RESEARCH. EVALUATION. APPLICATION. IMPACT.

About Us

About AIR
Board of Directors
Leadership
Experts
Clients
Contracting with AIR
Contact Us

Our Work

Education
Health
International
Workforce

Client Services

Research and Evaluation
Technical Assistance

News & Events

Careers at AIR


Search form


 

Connecting

FacebookTwitterLinkedinYouTubeInstagram

American Institutes for Research

1400 Crystal Drive, 10th Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-3289
Call: (202) 403-5000
Fax: (202) 403-5000

Copyright © 2020 American Institutes for Research®.  All rights reserved.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap