Skip to main content
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Contact

Search form

American Institutes for Research

  • Our Work
    • Education
    • Health
    • International
    • Workforce
    • ALL TOPICS >
  • Our Services
    • Research and Evaluation
    • Technical Assistance
  • Our Experts
  • News & Events

You are here

  • Home
11 Feb 2016
Blog Post

The New Title IIA: Scrapped, Diluted, or Fixed?

As Congress was in the heat of reauthorizing the Elementary and Secondary Education Act last spring, I tried to bring context, evidence, and (I hope) insight to the debate with a policy brief called Title II, Part A: Don’t Scrap It, Don’t Dilute It, Fix It.

It called for concentrating Title IIA funds on creating and funding performance improvement systems for individuals, schools, and districts.

The old Title IIA allowed funds to be used on an eclectic set of strategies—professional development, recruiting male teachers, licensure reform, and tenure reform to merit pay, hiring teachers to reduce class size, and more. The focus, albeit hazy, was on improving individual teacher and principal quality, rather than improving whole schools’ and districts’ capacity for sustained performance improvement.

The new Title IIA is blurry, too. Apparently, Congress was not entirely persuaded by the arguments I spelled out. Here are Fix It’s recommendations versus what ended up in the law:

Graphic: Fixing Title IIA

So, to hark back to the words of Don’t Scrap It, Don’t Dilute It, Fix It—the new Title IIA was not scrapped, not highly diluted, but not quite fixed.  

On the plus side, the new title of Title IIA is “Supporting Effective Instruction,” an improvement over the previous “Teacher and Principal Training and Recruiting Fund.” Although we still have largely the same grab bag we had under NCLB (with some tweaks), the new name suggests recognition that the work at hand is to enhance teaching, not just teachers and principals.

And, though the list of allowable uses seemed to get longer—for instance, states can establish teacher and school leader preparation academies, further diluting a focus on continuous performance improvement—it’s heartening that Congress now allows districts to use Title IIA funds to audit their teacher and principal evaluation and support systems. Systematic evidence-based review may well enhance organizational learning and sustained improvement.

Another plus: Title IIA funds can now be used to improve—and report progress on—equitable access to effective teachers and leaders. With teacher shortages increasing in Oklahoma, Nevada, California, and across the country, ensuring equity requires states to accelerate that work, and Title II dollars can grease the wheels.

One vestige of the old Title IIA also deserves mention—a fair bit of flexibility for local educators to decide what they and their colleagues need to do to keep getting better at their jobs. Policymakers should seize this opportunity to build coherent professional learning systems so teachers and education leaders get high-quality professional development throughout their careers.

And speaking of professional development, Fix It also called for simplifying the definition of “professional development” to just 36 words. The old Title IIA’s definition took 551 words. 

The new definition? 664.

Some things you can’t change.

Jane Coggshall is a principal researcher at AIR specializing in the intersections among research, policy, and practice of professional learning.

Related Work

2 Apr 2015
Blog Post

Coggshall Jane.jpg

Jane Coggshall

Up for Vote #4: Title IIA: What a Better Version Might Look Like in Your Neighborhood School System

Title II, Part A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act aims to increase academic achievement by improving teacher and principal quality. In this blog post, Jane Coggshall describes her recommendations to ensure that states, regions, and districts work more strategically both to develop individual teachers and leaders and to develop—and continuously improve—whole schools and districts.
Topic: 
Education, No Child Left Behind (NCLB), Teacher Preparation and Performance
18 Mar 2015
Blog Post

Coggshall Jane.jpg

Jane Coggshall

Title II, Part A: Don't Scrap It, Don't Dilute It, Fix It.

Washington is taking a close look at Title II, Part A (Title IIA) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as Congress debates reauthorization. AIR's new policy brief looks at how teacher professional development, as defined in the law and pursued in districts across the country, has shown mixed—mostly disappointing—effects on teacher practice and student learning.
Topic: 
Education
4 Feb 2016
Blog Post

DeMonte Jenny_4.jpg

Jenny DeMonte

The Leaky Pipeline: Why Don't New Teachers Teach?

Between a quarter and a half of those who complete a teacher preparation program don’t end up teaching after graduation. In our latest blog post, AIR’s Jenny DeMonte encourages policymakers to start tracking this data to help address teacher shortages and improve the teacher pipeline.
Topic: 
Education, Teacher Preparation and Performance

Further Reading

  • Title II, Part A: Don't Scrap It, Don't Dilute It, Fix It.
  • Brief: Title II, Part A: Don't Scrap It, Don't Dilute It, Fix It.
  • Up for Vote #4: Title IIA: What a Better Version Might Look Like in Your Neighborhood School System
  • Getting Beyond the Mirage of Professional Development
  • The Leaky Pipeline: Why Don't New Teachers Teach?
Share

Contact

Jane Coggshall

Jane Coggshall

Principal Researcher

Topic

Education
District and School Improvement
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)
No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Teacher Preparation and Performance

RESEARCH. EVALUATION. APPLICATION. IMPACT.

About Us

About AIR
Board of Directors
Leadership
Experts
Clients
Contracting with AIR
Contact Us

Our Work

Education
Health
International
Workforce

Client Services

Research and Evaluation
Technical Assistance

News & Events

Careers at AIR


Search form


 

Connecting

FacebookTwitterLinkedinYouTubeInstagram

American Institutes for Research

1400 Crystal Drive, 10th Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-3289
Call: (202) 403-5000
Fax: (202) 403-5000

Copyright © 2021 American Institutes for Research®.  All rights reserved.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap