Skip to main content
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Contact

Search form

American Institutes for Research

  • Our Work
    • Education
    • Health
    • International
    • Workforce
    • ALL TOPICS >
  • Our Services
    • Research and Evaluation
    • Technical Assistance
  • Our Experts
  • News & Events

You are here

  • Home
18 Jun 2014
Blog Post

Measuring Up in Mathematics: What’s the Right Measure?

Last month, new reports from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) presented two views of performance among 12th graders. The first, released May 7, shows a sharp contrast in the percentage of seniors judged proficient or advanced in reading and math. At grade 8, the percentage is virtually the same for both subject areas, but by 12th grade, many more students failed to hit the mark for math.

2013 NAEP Results: Percent Proficient or Advanced by Grade and SubjectChart: 2013 NAEP results by grade and subject

But NAEP’s proficiency levels may not tell the whole story.

New provisional estimates published May 14 by the National Assessment Governing Board, which oversees NAEP tests, look at the percentages of high school seniors who are academically prepared for college math and English. These results suggest a different story and show a greater agreement between the percentages of seniors who are prepared in math and reading.

Both views are based on thoughtful and well executed methodologies.

Broadly representative panels that include classroom teachers and members of the general public, as well as subject area specialists, set the three NAEP standards—Basic, Proficient, and Advanced—for students in 4th, 8th, and 12th grades. The standards are set separately for each grade and subject, and the Proficient level represents competency over challenging grade-appropriate subject matter and solid academic performance.

To set standards for college preparedness, the National Assessment Governing Board commissioned a series of research studies. Because NAEP does not track students over time, there is no direct evidence of how students who score at different levels on the NAEP scale fare in college. However, the researchers related NAEP to other tests (such as the SAT) that do have records of how their test takers perform in college. Using special arrangements that ensured student confidentiality, researchers were also able to examine the post-high school performance of NAEP test takers in one state. After the research was done, the Governing Board considered the body of evidence to determine the best NAEP score level in each subject area to serve as an indicator of preparedness. Here’s what they found:

2013 NAEP Results: Provisional Estimates of the Percent Academically Prepared for College

Chart: 2013 NAEP results by college readiness

If only 26 percent of high school seniors are proficient in math, how can 39 percent be academically prepared for college?

The answer to this seeming paradox is likely that the standard setters had different goals. On the one hand, we want students to build a strong mathematics foundation before college so that they are motivated and prepared for success in challenging STEM careers. Poor K-12 mathematics preparation is a barrier to entry into these fields. On the other hand, it appears that many students do just fine, thank you, with a lower level of mathematics preparation.

The Common Core State Standards also represent high aspirations for math performance, and the designers of the Common Core believe they have found new ways to organize the math curriculum to help students achieve. As we begin to see results for students schooled under the Common Core State Standards, it will be interesting to see whether achievement results for 12th grade students start to show a different pattern. Until achievement results for 12th grade students with a good dose of Common-Core-based education under their belts become available (several years into the future), educators who set NAEP standards may have to consider just what our national standard of math proficiency should be.

Related Work

1 Sep 2007
Report

Validity Study of the NAEP Mathematics Assessment: Grades 4 and 8

This 2007 report is the result of a request by the National Center for Education Statistics to the NVS panel to undertake a validity study of the current National Assessment of Education Progress (NAEP) mathematics assessment.

Topic: 
Education, Mathematics Education, NAEP

Further Reading

  • Proficient in One State May Not Mean Proficient in Another (Never Mind the Global Economy)
  • Education Performance Standards Vary Widely Among States, In Some Cases by Several Grade Levels
  • Most States Set Student Proficiency Goals for Reading and Math at Levels that Are Basic or Below Basic by the Standards of the National Assessment of Educational Progress
  • New Study Examines Alignment Between NAEP and Common Core State Standards in 4th, 8th Grade Mathematics
  • How NAEP Can Help Congress Weigh Student Achievement Standards
Share

Contact

Fran Stancavage

Fran Stancavage

Managing Researcher

Topic

Education
College and Career Readiness
Mathematics Education
NAEP

RESEARCH. EVALUATION. APPLICATION. IMPACT.

About Us

About AIR
Board of Directors
Leadership
Experts
Clients
Contracting with AIR
Contact Us

Our Work

Education
Health
International
Workforce

Client Services

Research and Evaluation
Technical Assistance

News & Events

Careers at AIR


Search form


 

Connecting

FacebookTwitterLinkedinYouTubeInstagram

American Institutes for Research

1400 Crystal Drive, 10th Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-3289
Call: (202) 403-5000
Fax: (202) 403-5000

Copyright © 2021 American Institutes for Research®.  All rights reserved.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap