Skip to main content
  • Experts
  • Careers
  • Contracting
  • Contact

Search form

American Institutes for Research

  • About Us
  • Our Topics
  • Client Services
  • News & Events

Policy Center header with image of capitol dome

You are here

  • Home
  • Policy Center
6 Jun 2014
Blog Post

Research and the Public Prekindergarten Debate

Early learning has few detractors, but publicly supported prekindergarten has many. Among those concerned are early care and education providers themselves. Private-for-profit and nonprofit centers, faith-based programs, family child care homes, and Head Start fear losing their four-year-olds to “free” prekindergarten programs in public schools.

That’s why many states let private providers help operate prekindergarten programs. Private providers serve most children in Georgia’s universal preschool program and Florida’s Voluntary Prekindergarten program. New Jersey’s Abbott Preschool Program is available to all three- and four-year-olds in the state’s poorest school districts; private centers and Head Start agencies contract with local school boards to serve two thirds of the children.

Many early care and education advocates have a different objection—that prekindergarten will be staffed by public school teachers with no background in early childhood education. But a recent AIR study of a publicly supported transitional kindergarten program serving four-year-olds in California found that 95 percent of the teachers had previously taught preschool, kindergarten, or first grade. Two thirds had training in social and emotional development.

Some early education advocates also worry that most publicly supported preschool programs operate too few hours a day, putting working parents in a bind. AIR’s study found that more than half of the school districts offer full school-day transitional kindergarten programs, though fewer large districts do. New Jersey’s Abbott Preschool Program—which also offers wraparound services—and Georgia’s universal preschool program are open at least six hours a day, 180 days per year. Given proper standards and funding, quality prekindergarten programs can be provided in a variety of settings. And careful planning can help states defuse some of the opposition to prekindergarten and better meet the needs of young children and their families.

This blog is a response to Who Opposes Early Learning by the National Journal (login required).

Further Reading

  • Three Important Questions About Publicly Funded Preschools
  • California’s Birth Through 3: Program Purpose and Design
  • Unmet Need for Preschool Services in California: Statewide and Local Analysis
  • Analysis of Options for Funding Universal Preschool in Sonoma County- Updated Report
  • Ten Questions Local Policymakers Should Ask About Expanding Access to Preschool
Share

Contact

Susan Muenchow

Principal Research Scientist

Policy Center

About the Center

Policy Center Blog

Products and Publications

Infographics

Podcasts and Videos

Policy Briefs

The Ten Series

EPC Search

Topic

Families, Communities, and Social Systems
Child Welfare
Early Childhood
Early Childhood and Child Development

RESEARCH. EVALUATION. APPLICATION. IMPACT.

About Us

About AIR
Board of Directors
Leadership
Experts
Clients
Contracting with AIR
Contact Us

Our Topics

Early Childhood
P-12 Education and Social Development
Higher Education and Career Readiness
Health and Wellness
Adult Learning and the Workforce

International

Client Services

Student Assessment
Research and Evaluation
Policy, Practice, and
Systems Change

News & Events

Careers at AIR


Search form


 

Connect

FacebookTwitterLinkedinGoogle+YouTubePinterestRSS

American Institutes for Research

1000 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW
Washington, DC 20007
Call: (202) 403-5000
Fax: (855) 459-6213

© 2017 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap